The Federal High Court in Abuja has scheduled November 20 for hearing a motion filed by former Vice President Atiku Abubakar. The motion seeks to amend his suit challenging the eligibility of President Bola Tinubu and the All Progressives Congress (APC) in the 2023 presidential election.
Atiku, candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in the February poll, had earlier approached the court questioning Tinubu’s qualification. He argued that the APC candidate was not eligible to contest based on alleged inconsistencies in his academic records and other issues.
The suit, filed before Justice Inyang Ekwo, has drawn wide attention as it touches on constitutional requirements for presidential candidates.
Related News
Atiku’s legal team filed a motion to amend the original suit. The amendment seeks to expand the grounds of challenge and include fresh evidence. The court has now fixed November 20 to hear arguments on whether the amendment should be allowed.
Lawyers representing Tinubu and the APC have indicated they will oppose the motion. They argue that Atiku’s request is an attempt to prolong litigation after the election has been concluded.
Justice Ekwo stated that the matter would be heard on the scheduled date. He directed parties to file all necessary processes before then. The judge stressed that the court would not entertain delays.
Related News
The Nigerian Constitution sets clear eligibility criteria for presidential candidates. These include citizenship, age, educational qualifications, and absence of criminal convictions. Disputes over compliance with these requirements often end up in court.
Atiku’s suit is one of several legal challenges that followed the 2023 election. While the Presidential Election Petition Tribunal and the Supreme Court have already ruled on broader election petitions, this case focuses specifically on eligibility.
If the court allows the amendment, Atiku will be able to introduce new claims. This could extend the legal battle and keep the eligibility question in public discourse.
If the court rejects the amendment, the case will proceed on the original grounds. That outcome may narrow the scope of arguments available to Atiku’s team.
Legal analysts note that the case highlights the importance of transparency in candidate documentation. Some argue that repeated challenges undermine confidence in the electoral process, while others insist that courts must clarify constitutional standards.
Political observers say the ruling on November 20 will determine whether Atiku’s challenge gains new momentum or fades.
